"There is no discernable temporal pattern that marks a word as no longer a loanword. It's a specious sugestion, and, most importantly, it won't help anyone spell plurals of < o >-final words any better."
Subscribe
Subscribe Now To Get Daily Updates
"There is no discernable temporal pattern that marks a word as no longer a loanword. It's a specious sugestion, and, most importantly, it won't help anyone spell plurals of < o >-final words any better."
"The LEX Grapheme Deck has separate <q> and <qu> cards. But there is no <q> grapheme in English, nor in Latin, nor in French."
This kind of error arises from mistaken thinking about orthography.
"If the word starts with [s], then why does it have a <t> in front of it?"
Also? This doesn't just happen with bound base elements! That is just total nonsense. A replaceable <e> can happen on free or bound bases, as well as on suffixes, and so can a potential <e>.
Subscribe Now To Get Daily Updates